In 2004, the voters of Michigan voted to place the definition of marriage into its State Constitution.
§ 25 Marriage.
Sec. 25.
To secure and preserve the benefits of marriage for our society and for future generations of children, the union of one man and one woman in marriage shall be the only agreement recognized as a marriage or similar union for any purpose.
History: Add. Init., approved Nov. 2, 2004, Eff. Dec. 18, 2004
And now the Supreme Court will hear the case of the two lesbian women who have children and whose “marriage” is not recognized in Michigan.
If the Supreme Court agrees with the women, every voter’s rights in Michigan have been effectively taken away.
This activism attacks federalism, the rights of the people who populate the States to have a say in how their State is governed, and is not how these things are supposed to be decided.
Governor Snyder stood by the constitutional right for Michiganders to decide the issue, ‘s “final say” in the matter. I applauded the Governor when he stood for the constitution, both Michigan’s and the US’ documents. But he now says, in a shallow and intellectually vacant comment,
“We appreciate that the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an issue that has been divisive in our state and others. It’s important for the same-sex marriage question to be resolved once and for all at the highest level,” Snyder said in a statement.
The people are the highest level, Governor, look it up.
Meanwhile, .
By the way, when is that racist head of the Department of Justice resigning? How is he still there?
