New Elite Member of the Committee to Publicly Horsewhip Karl Rove: Glenn Beck

I’d like to extend a prestigious elite membership of the Committee to Publicly Horsewhip Karl Rove today to Mr. Glenn Beck.

By expressing his view, and the view of so many of us grassroots conservatives who recognize Karl Rove as one of the main problems with the present Republican Party, he has met the criteria for full membership into this prestigious club.

As I wrote back in May of last year,

Karl Rove is not a guru of politics, he is not a smart tactician, and he must be properly disciplined.

We can’t figure out why he is still speaking. We can’t figure out why he’s on Fox News. We can’t figure out how he’s fooling the wealthy into giving him money to waste. In fact, Karl Rove is the single most dis-unifying person in Republican and conservative politics.

Why Democrats Should Love Karl Rove

It’s his usual tripe; he disregards, or rather, has no ability to read, the views of the American people, looks for a way the Republicans can beg off of a difficult road in a manner in which they can allow the Democrats get their way, and themselves a plausible explanation of why their hands were tied. Same song, second verse, a little bit louder and a little bit worse.

I guess it’s too much to ask that Karl Rove worry about things that actually matter, instead of how the Republicans can reward this administration’s unconstitutional behavior and come away with clean hands.

For Rove, it’s always about how the matter looks, not to the….

– See more at:

Please follow and like:

Karl Rove is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things

It’s getting boring, almost. Karl Rove’s routine is getting old. Let’s see, cite a few polls, give some advice no one asked for or should listen to, slime from studio to studio, and never, ever stand for principle.

Rove an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, detailing his thoughts on how the President can save his term.

Mr. Obama’s 40% approval is lower than Bill Clinton’s in 1994 and his own in 2010, when Democrats suffered massive midterm losses.

Finish the sentence, Rove. “..when Democrats suffered massive midterm losses due to the influence of the tea party on the Republican Party during election time.”

Absent a crisis that causes the nation to rally around him, Mr. Obama will never again see approval numbers like those in his first year in office or even the months after his re-election. He must now consider how to prevent a further slide.

Oh pleeeeze Mr. Obama, listen to Karl Rove and save yourself! We are all just so worried that your legacy might be that you are the worst president in history!

Can you believe it? Karl Rove worries that the president might not come off looking very good, and he wants to help.

Karl Rove is why the Republican Party sucks so bad. He’s a Republican consultant, pundit, media whore, and he doesn’t get that the Democrats are the enemy. It’s like he’s been biting his nails and losing sleep over how the President, the worst in our lifetime, can make himself likable, supposedly to Republican partisans.

Hey Rove, if Obama didn’t give a rat’s ass about Brian Terry, Ambassador Stevens, Glen Doherty, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and now Tahmooressi, then patriotic Americans shouldn’t give a rat’s ass about his legacy. In fact, the more trouble that piles on this president the better, so we can show what Marxism, applied liberally to a nation of free men will get you.

The more political Mr. Obama acts, the less successful he will be. Stepping back from hyperpartisanship is the only way to foster a climate in which Washington functions during his last two-and-a-quarter years.

So Karl Rove is betting that the Republicans are going to keep the House and take the Senate, and here he wants to give Obama a guide to how to work with a Republican Congress. There’s the difference between us and Rove. Rove gives no judgement of the President’s actions and intent, but there is an eagerness to partner with him anyway.

The president must stop diminishing his own credibility.

NO! Please, diminish your credibility, Obama! I don’t know if you could do a better job, but try anyhow!

He should show up in the Oval Office earlier and more often, golf and fundraise less, and give building relationships and digging into the tasks at hand everything he’s got for his last 28 months. There’s time to recreate after he leaves office.

Does anyone believe that our nation would be better off if the President spent more time digging up, shredding, and burying our national pride? Rove’s like, “Hey Obama, if you just applied yourself, you’d have a better outcome, you can do it, make us proud.” The part about recreation makes me think of Donald Trump’s tweet last night:

If Obama resigns from office NOW, thereby doing a great service to the country—I will give him free lifetime golf at any one of my courses!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)

THAT’s how an American talks to a President who has clearly created a global charlie foxtrot. Resign!

Mr. Obama must change for a better trajectory during his last months in office.

Sigh.

Finally, the president should discard his threats of unconstitutional executive action. When he circumvents Congress, Mr. Obama inflames tensions, makes it easier to undo his policies and could leave the presidency weaker by his overreach.

Yeah, because we wouldn’t want Mr. Obama’s policies to be easily undone. No, when the Republicans want amnesty, they want to make sure it’s permanent.

So many of us yearn for a principled Republican Party with a backbone. People like Karl Rove are why we can’t have nice things.

Mr. Obama’s difficulties are somewhat caused by circumstances, but mostly the result of his actions. His bad poll numbers were long in coming and may be impossible to reverse. Yet he can stabilize his situation. This will require him to acknowledge mistakes, shift in light of facts, and build bridges to political opponents and foreign allies. The question is whether he has the strength of character, energy, suppleness of mind, introspection and humility to make these necessary changes.

….Love can build a bridge…. I feel like that song should be playing in the background.

And what the hell kind of phrase is “suppleness of mind?”

If you’ve enjoyed this post, please consider donating!

[cpDonation key=’4′]

Shut Your Pie-Hole, Karl Rove!

Karl Rove is Wrong About the American People

The GOP must reject Karl Rove and his divisive tactics.

Available only during the month of September, get my Paul Revere Bear! This Limited Edition 18″ 5-jointed American Black Bear clothed and made just for you by yours truly is going fast! Your donation of $225 will make sure you receive this fine bear, so act now! Read more about him here!

[cpDonation key=’3′]

Please follow and like:

Shut Your Pie-Hole, Karl Rove!

Karl Rove, idiot extraordinaire, in the creepy hack site, :

“In American politics, there’s a sense you want to be new, you don’t want to be too familiar, you want to be something fresh, you don’t want to be something old and stale,” he said.

You know, like the names BUSH and ROVE.

So, um, so far the Bush brain has said that Hillary Clinton is brain damaged and old and stale. I just don’t think people should allow this guy to be the only voice on the right.

I don’t know if it’s that he’s not a woman, so he doesn’t get it, or what, and I can’t stand Hillary Clinton for a host of reasons, but there is no way that a person can win on points when you shoot yourself in the face. Every woman who hears what Karl Rove is suggesting every time he’s on the television, hears that this guy who is twice divorced, and a political games-player, using the stupidest sexist comments that you would never, ever say to a woman, ever.

And you know, Rove will chalk this type of talk up to feminism, and that Clinton believes in how women want to be treated like a man, but again, that is stupid, because women in general have emotions and when you start poking a stick at women’s emotions, you are going to get stung, and everyone around you will be.

It’s just stupid to use these terms to describe a woman. And I don’t recall Rove ever using the terms, brain damaged, old and stale to describe any man running for office, in fact, his political action groups are propping up very old men in the Senate, right now.

Of all the people in the nation that could be talking on television and influencing politics at this time, Karl Rove is about the worst specimen. He’s a loser, and he’s gonna help us lose again.

The Committee to Publicly Horsewhip Karl Rove

Please follow and like:

Truth! Fox Minus Rove Equals Ratings Surge

Mark Levin, charter premium elite member of the wildly popular Committee To Publicly Horsewhip Karl Rove expressed a truth this morning that, if acted upon, might make a lot of people, a lot of money.

Fox would increase its ratings if it dumped RINO mouthpiece Rove

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow)

And at this point, I’d even keep O’Reilly around for laughs.

Please follow and like:

Rove Myth Debunked

MYTH: Karl Rove is on our side.

Whenever someone on the right criticizes Karl Rove, there is an inevitable busybody who will say, “Stop attacking people who are on our side.” However, Rove is not on our side, and as chair of the wildly popular Committee to Publicly Horsewhip Karl Rove, it is my honor to point it out to you.

Rove was a guest on Fox News Sunday yesterday, to defend his argument that Hillary Clinton’s health and age might be a problem in 2016. I don’t need to go over it, parse it, or create a study of it. All you need to know is, that his ego could not keep him from changing the talking points from substantive issues to a silly media frenzy with him at the center.

Before Rove hit the news with his “brain damage” crusade, we were talking about how Hillary Clinton failed as Secretary of State to classify Boko Haram as a terrorist group. Before Rove inserted himself into the news, we were talking about how the mother of one of the four Benghazi dead blamed Hillary personally for the death of her boy, and organized protests kept Hillary from speaking in San Diego.

Now, you defenders of Rove, tell me, what carries weight? Is Hillary walking around today with obvious mental incapacity? Is she losing her place in the speeches she’s been giving to make outrageous sums of money after botching the Secretary of State gig? No? Then what possible reason could there be to change the conversation and focus, other than to stroke Rove’s ego?

Rove defenders want to believe that Rove is acting in good faith, but how is attacking a woman personally going to help the Republican Party if she runs in 2016, while the Republican Party is having a tough time getting women to vote for them?

Juan Williams was right during the panel discussion yesterday, that Rove could be generating sympathy for Clinton. Yes, he is, and he’s not helping our side, because he is interested in being the center of attention, and that’s all.

Rove’s existence in politics seems to be for the purpose of cheapening and dumbing down the political argument, and that is in line with his view of regular voters. He believes we are stupid, and wants the Republican Party to not necessarily “win the argument.” It is the equivalent of throwing enough mud on the wall to see what will stick, and he wants desperately to control the narrative. But his offerings are only mud, nothing of substance, and he not only generates sympathy for a huge Republican foe, he keeps us from gaining momentum on real issues we really care about that should concern everyone about Hillary Clinton.

Please follow and like:

The Committee to Publicly Horsewhip Karl Rove

Karl Rove is not a guru of politics, he is not a smart tactician, and he must be properly disciplined. His latest comment about Hillary Clinton was sloppy and stupid, and it’s time to let everyone know that conservatives want nothing to do with him.

We can’t figure out why he is still speaking. We can’t figure out why he’s on Fox News. We can’t figure out how he’s fooling the wealthy into giving him money to waste. In fact, Karl Rove is the single most dis-unifying person in Republican and conservative politics.

A friend of mine, Dan Riehl, said it right when he, “Rove’s problem. He didn’t “raise” the health issue. He made a direct accusation. If a conservative said same thing, GOP would denounce him.” That is a fact. So, what we need is a combined effort to denounce Karl Rove for poisoning conservative opportunities to win.

Of course this effort is not limited to Rove’s “brain damage” accusation of Hillary Clinton. We conservatives must point out just how this one man is harming the nation’s ability to survive. Bush’s brain has got to go. The blossom is off the turd. The architect of second place must be shown the door.

You have an opportunity to become a member of a special committee, formed out of necessity, to register the proper amount of criticism of a man whose influence in politics must come to an end.

In line with the late great William F. Buckley Jr.’s appeal in National Review, “The Committee to Horsewhip Drew Pearson,” your charter membership in, “The Committee to Publicly Horsewhip Karl Rove,” will commence when you share this post.

Further, there are three levels of membership, Classic, Premium, and Elite.

Classic membership is attained when you share a facebook post or tweet about how Karl Rove is ruining our chances as Republicans to win elections, or any other thing about the man’s political influence you find distasteful.

Premium members will write a blog post or photoshop or some shareable piece outside of a facebook post, detailing one of his many political failures or even a positive post about a time when he shut the hell up. These are just ideas, the point is, you have to influence public opinion beyond facebook.

Elite members will sustain their membership through writing or on youtube, five or more posts or videos about Karl Rove, giving reasons why he should exit the national stage of politics. I happen to be a super platinum Elite member by writing about Rove, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.

You can organize at the grassroots level as well, writing in local papers or magazines, the opportunities to horsewhip Karl Rove are endless, and really only limited by your imagination. Of course, we do not wish bodily harm on Rove, we just want him to exit the national political stage through the peaceful right to speak up.

The Committee to Publicly Horsewhip Karl Rove is hereby announced. Please share.

Who’s with me?

Please follow and like:

The Architect of Second Place Has More Useless Advice

For those of you who still believe Karl Rove is trying to help get rid of Democrat Party rule, please get a grip. This guy does nothing without calculation, and his calculations, as we recall that fateful night in November 2012 were terribly, terribly wrong.

Many think he’s just lost his mojo, but I think he is so frightful that a conservative might win in 2016, and rout him and the rest of his Bushie leeches out of DC, that he is actually setting up to help the Democrats win.

Fox News has a story, “” Sound familiar? Don’t criticize Obama? He’s a nice guy? This Republican Party is finished if it continues to keep its hands in its pockets and refuses to get serious.

Rove told “Fox News Sunday” he was uncertain whether revisiting Clinton and husband Bill Clinton’s years in the White House would help Republicans win the presidency.

This guy’s not on our side. Of course it’s relevant. Of course it’s political fodder. He seduced a young woman in the Oval Office and they fooled around enough to get his sperm on her blue dress. Meanwhile, Hillary, the feminazi in chief, blamed the “right wing conspiracy” as Monica was humming. Give me a break. Rove is an idiot, and this is proof.

But it’s not only the blue dress and the impeachment and allowing this molester back into the White House, it’s the control-freak that is Hillary Clinton, it’s HillaryCare, it’s all the scandals, it’s everything. People on the street do not know what this woman is capable of, and Rove would like to focus on what, exactly?

“It may,” said Rove, now a “Fox News” contributor. “But the trouble for Republicans is it’s easier to say what you’re against than what you are for.”

I’m for disabling Hillary Clinton politically so that she slinks out of DC and out of my life permanently. Rove is a meat head. He can slither alongside.

But wait, there’s more, Mitt Romney, loser because he thinks Obama’s a nice guy, loser because he never wanted to run for President and now is on TV every other day lecturing us when he should be making commercials for some pharmaceutical company by now, has a brilliant opinion so similar to Rove’s that they just might share the same lust for losing.

Also on Sunday, 2012 GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney warned against attacking the Clinton political legacy.

“I don’t think Bill Clinton is as relevant as Hillary Clinton,” he told NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

MITT ROMNEY IS PROTECTING BILL CLINTON. He protected Obama by not blasting away at him like he did Newt and all the others. What more can these New England Princes say to convince us that they are really not that in to winning and leading?

“It’s more important to say what you’re for,” Rove continued. “Anyone taking on Hillary Clinton — Democrat or Republican — had better focus on what they’re for to contrast implicitly against Hillary.

It’s important, but not more important. It’s equally important, and anyone taking on Hillary can’t leave Bill out of it. But, why is Rove giving advice to Democrats? Is he so delusional that they’re out there frantically searching for a pen and a pad and feverishly writing down his advice? It think he is.

Rove is as delusional as Romney and the rest of the leaders of the Republican Party.

So what does Rove say we can focus on? Benghazi. We can’t talk about Bill’s cigar or all the cover-ups, but we are allowed to talk about Benghazi. But notice the addendum.

“There are lots of unanswered questions, and they will continue to be an issue,” Rove said. “Families [of the victims] want answers. The questions won’t go away until the questions are answered.”

Of course we all know she has already answered everything, and it doesn’t make any difference anyway.

The architect of second place won’t shut the hell up.

Please follow and like:

“Reagan was Delta all the way.”

The fight between conservatives and Republicans was put into mainstream understanding by Craig Shirley last year in a piece called, “”

I have been lucky enough to receive Craig Shirley’s books on Reagan, and I will be reviewing them soon. These books are necessary in understanding this fight, and how it must be waged, but the two frat houses in “Animal House” serves as a great example of why we can’t just, “get along.”

Craig’s theory is this: That Reagan would have been in Delta House along with the rest of us, challenging the establishment, to hell with the stupid rules made by those upholding the status quo. And, it is fun to think about, too.

Delta House was based on individuality and freedom, challenging the established order: the essential elements of American conservatism. Wasn’t it Otter who made an impassioned defense of freedom and patriotism?

Omega was autocratic and establishmentarian, with a false projection of Utopianism. Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and the Bushes would have fit right in. They knew the rules did not apply to them, but they applied to everyone else. Power flowed downward. Same with Mitt Romney. He looked at conservatives like they were only there to pick up his dirty tennis shorts. No wonder many conservatives saw the election of 2012 as a choice between Tweedledee and Tweedledumb.

Now, this is not a hard and fast rule, but it is a pretty good guideline. Yes, I know some will say “what about the religious right?” But, as any of us sinners knows, the church isn’t just for saints. The religious right guys and gals would have been with us, if only to save us from ourselves. Or they would have been “independents,” coming to our parties on Saturday, in their pews on Sunday. Guilty pleasure? You bet. This is also the fusionism of the “Social Right” and the “Sociable Right,” which conservative theoretician Frank Meyer and others constructed as the basis for American conservatism in the 1950’s.

Can anybody imagine Karl Rove or Stephen J. Law in Delta House? I don’t think so. In fact, most of the Bushies I’ve observed are pretty uptight. Come to think of it, both Rove and Omega House President Greg Marmalard worked for Nixon.

Ha, love that Marmalard and Rove worked for Nixon line. Perfect.

Read the rest.

Please follow and like:

Virginia’s Lessons Are Lost On GOPe and That’s OK

Karl Rove’s spin is in serious wobble.

The bespectacled self-appointed show boss of the GOP writes his on Virginia’s gubernatorial race, where he says that the shutdown cost Cuccinelli the win, along with his views on social issues, and a host of other reasons that don’t exactly smell right.

To make his point, Rove uses some quotes from political strategist Chris LaCivita,

As Cuccinelli campaign strategist Chris LaCivita told the on Nov. 2, the campaign spent early October “debating the shutdown and not the ObamaCare fight.” After the shutdown, the disastrous rollout of the Affordable Care Act took center stage—and Mr. Cuccinelli began closing the gap. Following Mr. Cuccinelli’s concession speech, Mr. LaCivita mused to the Washington Post, “I can’t help but ask myself, what would have been the result had he had five weeks of this discussion instead of just 2½?”

OH the big if only. Two can play that game. If only the 25 Republicans who voted for cloture would have listened to Ted Cruz who repeatedly encouraged them to join him in opposing cloture. If only one of of those 25, who was served by LaCivita in his election bid, Bob Corker, would have not been so confuuuused on how voting against cloture would have kept the Democrats from setting up a shutdown strategy. If only Bob would have not given Reid a simple majority margin. OH if only.

The idea that anyone takes this guy seriously anymore amazes me, with his win percentage of a record 1.7% last year, somehow losing the Thompson and Mack races, and melting down when his supposedly genius predictions were so very, embarrassingly wrong.

The rest of the Rove re-write is predictable Rove, dumb social issues, too controversial, blah blah blah. But in Rove’s own mundane and breathtakingly torturous way, it is great art how he sidesteps any possibility that he may be wrong, and that the Virginia race signals the end of his control of the Republican Party.

Ken Cuccinelli damn near won against all obstacles, and the fact that he only needed a little help from the party, who spent three times as much on the last governor, McDonnell, to put him over the top proves they are on their way out.

Mr. Rove needs to work on his strong negatives. Namely, people like me. We are all those things they come looking for during primary time. He thinks we don’t matter, and that’s OK.

Because we’ll be here pointing out how his hold on the party is over.

Please follow and like:

Category: Karl Rove