Pro-Abort Policy Ultimately Discriminates Against Women

It’s kind of hard to claim you are pro-women when you know how many are being killed because of their sex, and that makes it hard to claim that the unborn child isn’t a child at all — especially when the results of the extermination could possibly mean that abortion-on-demand is guaranteeing less and less women in future generations.

Please read the rest of my commentary at

Please follow and like:

Turning a Blind Eye to the Truth About Abortion

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York , and doesn’t plan on viewing the the harvest and sale of human body parts by Planned Parenthood, an agency that receives federal funds.  When asked about the videos, Gillibrand said:

“I think what Planned Parenthood does around the country is provide healthcare for millions of women who have no access to health care at all. And, only a very small part of their budget goes to abortion services. 97 percent of their budget is focused on basic health care. Anyone who wants to defund Planned Parenthood, wants to defund health care for women across the United States.”

That’s not entirely accurate. does not claim that abortion occupies only three percent (3%) of their budget. It’s the number of services provided.  For example, Planned Parenthood claims….

Please read the rest of my commentary at

Please follow and like:

We Are All ‘Products of Conception’

Since pro-aborts regularly argue that the baby is not a human, just tissue or an embryo, and they often describe the child as a parasite to the “host,” I thought it might be useful to let them know that even abortionists know the child is a child – and part of “the products of conception.”

Please follow and like:

The Left’s Antics Protected, While the Lord Is Held Suspect

image via
image via

If you’ve ever been to a real hardcore protest like those orchestrated by a variety of leftist organizers, you would see and hear many odd displays of physical- and emotional-assaulting behavior: loud stomping in unison, with chants and rhyming slogans; the practice of laying down in silent protest, coinciding with interspersing shrieks, as if someone is getting skinned alive; banging on five gallon drums directed at and alongside mounted police; the creation of human barriers, formed by people yelling chants while linked together to create a human wall; and throngs of people working as one to stampede or personally injure anyone who gets in their way.  All of these methods, methods of psychological, emotional and physical (when they can get away with it) warfare, are used everywhere in this nation to achieve political ends through protest.

When massive protests come to a state capitol, in an effort to protect the protesters from any opposition, the capital police rope off areas where protests should occur, as if the antics of shrieking banshees and ludicrous, aping and immature philistines hold a vaunted place in the long history of this great nation.

Yet a handful of people saying the Lord’s Prayer outside the office of the Speaker of the House are and told to cease because they are breaking the law.

I don’t want to hear a diatribe of what law they were breaking, how it disturbs the peace, why some ignoramus believes this has something to do with the separation of church and state or that they didn’t get some stupid permit or whatever the case may be.  If you’ve never seen the debasement of humanity at a leftist-led protest, you are unqualified to proffer a comment about a few people kneeling and saying the Lord’s Prayer.

The Declaration of Independence, signed by men who knew their actions would be considered treasonous, mentions God four times. The left’s riot-hungry protestors would never have the guts to do what they did, nor would they consider praying, for they are godless.

I suppose reciting, “Our Father, who art in Heaven, hallowed be thy name, thy Kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in Heaven,” isn’t as catchy as, “Ain’t no power like the power of the people cuz the power of the people don’t stop, say what?”  Yet, the difference between the right and the left becomes crystal clear when the two sentences are compared.

The good, right and true know that we owe our blessings and our crosses to God, but collectively, the left is a selfish beast, hungering to amass power in only itself, that never acknowledges a higher power – well, except perhaps a government devoted to selfish ends.

Jill Stanek, a commendable and much admired (including by this author) anti-abortion activist, along with a small number of people who knelt and prayed the Lord’s Prayer outside the office of the Catholic Speaker of the House in the nation’s capital, was arrested.

Such injustice to the laws of nature and nature’s God cannot be allowed to persist.

This article was originally posted at

Please follow and like:

Leftist Women’s Rights Groups – Busily Ignoring Women’s Rights

AP Photo/Desiree Hunter
AP Photo/Desiree Hunter

Horrific reports have been coming out about the terrible treatment of girls and women who are captured by ISIS.  Women and girls, including the pre-pubescent are being subjected to rape in the most brutal and depraved manner, causing some to take their own lives rather than endure the horror.  So sick is the Islamic State that reports are out that the ISIS fighters are demanding Viagra to carry on their unnatural crimes against humanity.

Here in America, the leftist women who claim to hold the views of all women, have not made the human rights issue central to their arguments.  In fact, they haven’t mentioned the daily rape of these women at all.  Their central cause – amongst the devastating news of the fate of women captured by ISIS, virginity taken, abused and tortured – is free contraception, abortion-on-demand and promotion of sexual promiscuity in the land of milk and honey.

Those who understand that the only work of leftist national women’s groups is to subjugate women to men in the pursuit of “sexual freedom”…

Read the rest at .

Please follow and like:

Pro-abortion Advocates are Anti-Human

Today marks the 41st annual March For Life in Washington, D.C..

In 1957, at the age of 10, Norma McCorvey robbed a gas station and started on a path that no one would want for their child.  Norma’s mother was an alcoholic, and violent, and Norma would spend a lot of her life abusing drugs, alcohol and wasting her life.

In 1969, Norma became pregnant for the third time.  The first child was taken from her by her mother.  The second child was cared for by the father.  But, while living in Texas, Norma listened to friends who told her to lie about being raped, so she could obtain an abortion.  At the time, Texas’ laws did not permit abortion except in cases of rape and incest.  When the authorities could not find legal documentation of the supposed rape, Norma recanted and tried to get an illegal abortion.

Lawyers who were plaintiff-shopping for the purposes of changing abortion law in the State of Texas, used Norma as she had been used and abused her entire life.  She signed an affidavit saying that she had been raped, and the lawyers fought all the way to the Supreme Court, eventually overturning State laws that restricted abortion.  During the legal battles, Norma’s baby was born and adopted.

Here we are 41 years later, and the pro-aborts are still using deception to promote more loss of life.

But, being pro-life is on the rise, and having information at your fingertips is on the rise,  is on the rise, and intelligent, calm reason is winning over the screech, “It’s my body!” when the affected is in fact, another’s.

People who argue that abortion is a right are anti-human.  They do not have compassion for the innocent, and defy the laws of nature.  They ultimately disregard belief in God, claiming they hold the highest power over the lives of others.  And they have convinced millions to abandon their roles as life-givers, and become life-takers.

They also claim that, in order to be a woman, you must be pro-abortion, and too many weak politicians have allowed their anti-human screech-fest to bully them into positions that continue the practice of ripping the arms, legs, body and then crush the head of an unborn child whose heart is beating.

If you don’t like the graphic nature of this article, you must be pro-life.

Because of two, lying, pro-abortion lawyers in Texas, and an unconstitutional decision by the Supreme Court, abortion has been legal for 41 years.  But attitudes across the nation have not ever been in their favor.

Now that individual States are reclaiming their right to address the runaway nature of so-called “abortion-rights,” the pro-aborts are gasping for a national referendum once again during an election year.  The anti-human nature of the radicalized feminist movement though, is plain for all to see, in their zeal to end lives that are housed in the quintessential purpose of a woman and a womb.

The ability to produce new life is, to many, a sacred calling.  To some, the inconvenience of nature pushes them to inflict upon everyone their anti-human view.  The true civil and human rights advocates are those who are pro-life.

Last year, the Gosnell trial showed the disgusting underbelly of the pro-abort’s progress in women’s rights.  The lies he told to rack up more and more abortions, the slaughter of completely formed children, the callous disregard for human life of both the children and mothers sickened the nation.  That these types of abortion clinics existed was a horrific reality of the abuse of women for profit.  And not only do the pro-abortion activists screech to keep them open, but they screech to increase the numbers.

Roe v. Wade was brought on the lie that Norma was raped and that since she could not prove it, then lost access to an abortion.  Norma is, today, a pro-life activist who has turned her life over to God.  Today, those that defend Roe v. Wade defend lies and liars who knowingly distort in order to keep the abortion industry going.  An anti-human industry whose sole purpose is to defy nature and nature’s God.

In fact, the basis of Western Civilization was founded upon the goodness of man.  The so-called “progressive” movement was founded upon the opposite.

Norma was used by a lot of people, and she admits her life was troubled – but, while working in the pro-abort movement, who took pity upon Norma?  Not the lawyers or activists around her, but a man of the cloth who eventually baptized her and helped her find God.  The compassion we all seek for our trials is out there, if we would stop rejecting Him.

In today’s March For Life, we see the civil libertarians of today, fight for the philosophy of our founding.  They fight for our Declaration of Independence which says that all men are created equal, and they are endowed by their Creator, certain unalienable rights, the first of which is Life.

It is good, right and true, to be on the side of life and reject the anti-humanists and all their deceptions.

This article first appeared at .

Please follow and like:

Abortion Industry’s Marketing Department Goes into Overdrive

Just before the Christmas break, the Michigan Legislature, dominated by Republicans, passed a bill that would allow Michigan to opt out of taxpayer funding of abortions under the new Obamacare law.

The saga began as a couple of bills passed through the legislature a little over a year ago.  The Republican majority in the House and super-majority in the Senate passed one bill that would restrict abortion mills and require higher facility standards of the State’s abortion clinics, and another that would allow Michigan taxpayers to opt out of paying for abortions under the Obamacare law, making it necessary for those seeking coverage for abortions to buy a separate rider.

Governor Snyder, a Republican, vetoed the opt-out bill but signed the restriction bill, stating that he believed the opt-out bill didn’t strike the right balance, because it did not provide for women who had been raped or were victims of incest.

Conservatives were incensed. How could it make sense to force taxpayers to pay for all abortions in Michigan, 99.9% of which had nothing to do with rape or incest?

Brilliantly, Michigan’s Constitution provides for the people to organize and petition for the legislature to reconsider a bill that has been vetoed, and if they collect enough signatures to equal at least eight percent of the recent gubernatorial voting population, the legislature can put through the bill once again, and is not subject to the Governor’s veto.

We did just that.  Michigan Right to Life sent packets of petitions statewide, and collected almost 300,000 signatures in a very short amount of time, much more than needed, according to the Constitution.

Once the Board of Canvassers certified the signatures, the bill was produced, and immediately faced an assault by the pro-abort leftists, calling it a “rape-insurance” bill.

Now, to understand their lurid argument, you’ll have to bend your mind inside out.

They claimed that if a woman had to purchase a separate rider to cover abortion, that it is tantamount to forcing a woman to weigh the probability of being raped, and that the thought of having to wonder if you’d be covered in case of rape was too much for any woman to have to consider.  So, naturally, it should be that taxpayers pay for all abortion to avoid this rhetorical caveat.

To unscramble their argument, you have to understand that leftists equate “access” with “free.”  They wanted to have the taxpayers of Michigan fund abortion as a benefit in every policy, in order to provide free abortion in case of rape.

It assumes also that all women who have been raped, and conceived, would elect to have an abortion. This is not the case.

The disturbing argument, meant to shock and to keep the words “rape” and “GOP” in the headlines, glossed over the fact that if a woman is pro-abortion, she has access to abortion by purchasing a separate rider.  She has to pay for it herself, because the taxpayers, time and time again, do not want to pay for someone else’s abortion.

By the way, pro-aborts know that Planned Parenthood, funded by taxpayers, provides low cost and often free abortions no matter what the claim or reason, even, as conservatives will remember from the exposé from Live Action, if the mother decides she would rather not have a child of a particular sex.

Facing the macabre dialogue coming from the left, there was some speculation that the Speaker of the House might not put the bill to a vote, risking a provision in the Constitution that provides for a 40-day window for passage.  If the legislation is not acted upon within those 40 days, the bill becomes eligible for a ballot measure, putting it to a vote in the upcoming elections of 2014.

Once again, it was all hands on deck for the conservative activists in the state, calling, faxing, and emailing their representatives, and it paid off.

The final day that the House was in session, the bill was taken up simultaneously in the House and Senate, and passed on a bipartisan basis.

The law will go into effect in March.  Until then, we can expect the left in Michigan, and their allies around the country, to try everything they can to force taxpayers to pay for abortion-a moral repugnance seen by many of us as one of the greatest assaults on mankind.

But the left is losing the argument, not only on taxpayer funding of abortion, but abortion itself.  After the Gosnell trial, the marketing division of the abortion industry has become very desperate.  In my view, social media has become a powerful tool to help clarify the inhumanity of abortion, and how its proponents have little integrity left to stand on.

As it is difficult to provide a photo depicting abortion in a positive light, the social media images of what abortion actually entails, how a child inside the mother is a separate being and connects that image with the right to live, whose death is therefore not a choice, and so many other intellectually stimulating charts and facts, helps codify the issue for those who never thought much past the flowery image of choice.

For the many that believe that the unconstitutional legalization of abortion, imposed on America by the left, was the quintessential blow to Western Civilization, it is perhaps a consolation that the left has to go to such outrageous, ridiculous and desperate lengths, not only to try to prove that it’s a woman’s choice to take another’s life, but that you must pay for it.

This article was first published at

Please follow and like:

The Logic of Abortion “Rights”

First appeared at


Last week, a top-of-the-hour newscast on my radio featured Lindsay Graham, who was arguing for banning abortions after 20 weeks based on the findings that babies can feel pain in utero at that time.

Why 20 weeks? According to  Congress heard from experts, at eight weeks, a baby reacts to touch, and after 20, he reacts to pain.

That’s just what they have agreement on.  For instance, there are experts who say that once the child has developed spinal circuitry at eight weeks, he feels pain.

Senators in Washington, DC are not looking to halt abortion up to 20 weeks, just after, but that doesn’t stop extremists in Congress like Patty Murray  like it will take away all her rights as a woman, Slate writer Will Saletan  an outright ban on all abortion, and Kate Sheppard of Mother Jones , “Akin!”

Considering that the Roe v. Wade decision was unconstitutionally decided on the basis of the right to privacy (laughable now in the wake of NSA and IRS investigations), only a pro-life president and the opportunity of replacing out-going liberal Supreme Court judges would be able to provide the right circumstance to overturn it.

So, here we are, discussing whether or not a baby feels pain when he is being ripped apart and sucked down a tube. In the end, the child is dead.

I once worked in a veterinarian’s office and had to be present when an Irish Setter was put down.  He felt no pain.

Some women are especially shrill when they think their “fundamental right” to kill another human being is questioned or threatened, and they use words like “logical” to describe the ambiguity of the eight week to 20 week disparity.

It’s anti-human.

Women who have grown up hearing that it’s a woman’s reproductive right to abort based on a Supreme Court ruling are the ones truly ignorant of the human rights violations they are condoning, and that ignorance sends them to the polls to protect the right to kill another.

Kill? They say, no, no, you see, we are only removing the unviable fetus, we aren’t killing.  The word ‘fetus’ is Latin for ‘offspring’, but beyond that, when you are trying to distinguish the exact moment when your fetus feels pain, you are admitting it’s alive, and it’s another human being, because if it was you, you’d know.

“I have the right to do what I want with my body!” They screech.  But it’s not their body they are killing, it’s someone else’s.

On one of the Sunday news shows, some journalists were trying to decipher why Cuccinelli lost and Christie won and, of course, they landed on those, “social issues.”  When one of the journalists said to the other that the two politicos’ positions on life were virtually the same, the other journalist said that Christie was smart enough to not make a big deal about it.

Absolutely.  Because, when you feel strongly about issues of life and death, it’s best to keep that light under a bushel.

Actually, the journalists that cover politics make a mockery of those who have strong life views when they are also deemed strong enough to cut budgets and spending and act responsibly in office.  They work with pro-death culture groups to raise fear and anger and hatred.  Anything to keep those with a moral compass out of office.

We are at a turning point in history, and many God-fearing Americans believed it started with the Roe v. Wade decision.

Ridiculous arguments were used to appease DC public opinion, and create a culture in America that is anti-God and that promotes hedonism and irresponsibility.  If you are aware of history, it started well before that.  But, it is interesting to note that, when you discuss abortion and politics, Godly respect for one another flies out the window, and the extremists scream for a right they think the court gave them.

Of all the rights acknowledged by our founding documents, the Right to Life is listed first, and is given to us by our Creator.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Without life, we have no other ability.  Someone needs to protect that Right.

– See more at:


Please follow and like:

Draconian Abortion Law?

You’ve heard of draconian spending cuts and draconian tax laws, but the has penned a story about the Texas abortion laws being “draconian.”

The stupid, it hurts.

But it is not just how stupid and twisted the AP’s reporting has become, it is the dereliction of duty on reporting rather than editorializing that has sunk the art of journalism to the depths it finds itself in.

The Texas effective banning of all abortion past 20 weeks is being done through a democratic and representative republic process, part of which featured a successful filibuster.  Its entire focus is on avoiding a Gosnell situation in Texas, elevating the filthy clinics to hospital and emergency ambulatory standards, yet the pro-aborts are fighting tooth-and-nail to keep filthy substandard treatment.

The argument of the use of hangers and back alleys is replaced with access to legal disease-filled hole-in-the-wall dungeonesque filth and decay.  If anything is draconian, it is the death penalty for the unborn for existing and fighting for life within his mother’s soon-to-be barren womb.

Draco was an Athenian scribe, who wrote laws that punished small crimes with massive penalties, many including death and slavery.  Yet this putrid media phony Tomlinson suggests that cleaning up and stopping the murder of innocents is akin to Draco’s laws?

A draconian abortion law would sentence abortionists to death and exile the woman for manslaughter.  It is at that fevered pitch that pro-aborts wish to lash pro-lifers.  Yet, what is truly happening, is a nation divided over the respect for one another, love and the right to life.  Life means nothing to those who consider it their right to hire someone to rip apart a child and crush his head, all so they can go out and do it over and over, proclaiming an inherent right that was NEVER given.

(image via

The grainy video of an abortion in the epic film, The Silent Scream, showed the fact that babies at 12 weeks try to move away from the sucking of the powerful vacuum introduced into the womb, in an attempt to defend herself against something that wishes to harm her.  They have heartbeats and feel pain, and their very last action is to try to stay alive.

How can this nation allow these forces of evil in politics and media to rule our clarity on the subject?

The argument in today’s political landscape is outdated and unfocused.  We are no longer talking about incest and rape and life of the mother.  We are talking about repeated intentional murder of children of primarily minority women, with the pro-choice movement turning to mob mentality when a simple suggestion of setting standards is entered into the discussion.  Meanwhile, the left has created the myth that women have a right to kill their own child, and pro-choicers pacify their own egos by proclaiming a right to do what they will with their own bodies.  Breaking down and focusing the argument must include the fact that they have therefore established that they have the right to murder themselves, not their children, who are different people.

Those who are pro-life activists stress the necessity of passing Personhood statutes.  Getting a Personhood argument to the Supreme Court would be one way of attacking the unconstitutionality of the Roe V. Wade decision, but the culture must be turned away from the acceptance of abortion as a means of birth control, first.

A majority of women of a certain age are almost hard-wired to promote abortion for any reason.  And reason is not ever entered into the discussion.  A right has been established in their minds, and any standards-driven reform is treated as a personal attack on women’s role in the world. We must counter with a consistent clarifying message and never forget the fact that we are talking about innocent defenseless children being murdered in an ongoing holocaust right here in this nation and blessed by the Democrat party from the President on down.

We haven’t an unbiased media.  We have instead, a sick, self-abusive system of corrupt anti-humans who do not have the ability to know right from wrong, and who use their soulless days to force the rest of us to accept their evil.

We are a nation whose soul is blackened by petulant abusers of liberty.  Only decent, honest people who know right from wrong can lift it from the ashes, working in unison, to dispel the current wave of anti-human pigs, who are invested in hedonism and the false promises of empty lives.

We must speak out, we must stand for life, and teach about the goodness of life, and the responsibilities of adulthood, because nobody is learning anything from reading news sources like the AP.

Please follow and like:

Gosnell the Butcher-So you say you are pro-choice…

Gosnell was found guilty of three counts of first degree murder of babies who lived after his abortion services.

The left will condemn him, but they will defend the practice of aborting children up to birth, because the left is anti-human, pro-death. Never forget that.

These murders are shocking, but remember the President of the United States argued in favor of allowing children to die if they were victims of botched abortions while he was a State Senator in Illinois.

And for the record, I’d like to reopen the “Greedy Doctors” argument from Obama’s Affordable Care Act. Greedy Gosnel the Butcher.

Here is a collection of internet addresses of stories I collected as this story began. I’m not linking to them all, just copy and paste in your web browser if you have the stomach.

Please follow and like: